Key Reports
Hurst Green Parish Site Options and Assessment Report and Appendix 21st May 2019
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Screening Opinion 17th December 2018
Evidence #35 – Hurst Green local housing demand survey
Relevant Documents
Hurst Green Existing (2006) Development Boundary and a wider view of the same Boundary
Highways England response to spatial planning and appendixes: HE Geometric Design of Major Minor Priority Junctions / HE Vehicular Access to All Purpose Trunk Roads February 2019
Hurst Green Rapid Grassland Assessment
February 2020
Affordable Housing
Locality report for Hurst Green: Neighbourhood Development Order briefing / proposed actions
January 2020
Guidance for site owners / developers
The High Weald AONB Unit – Design Guide for new Housing Development
Maps of Potential Sites / Call for Sites
4 Nov 2019 – Extended call for sites map: Hurst Green Village version 11 and Silver Hill version 6 note: replaces all previous versions
11 Aug 2019 – Extended call for sites map: Hurst Green Village version 10 – note: replaces all previous versions
22 Apr 2019 – Extended call for sites map: Hurst Green Village version 8 – note: replaces all previous versions
22 Apr 2019 – Extended call for sites map: Silver Hill version 5 and Swiftsden version 6 – note: replaces all previous versions
30 Jan 2019 – Update to extended call for sites map at Silver Hill (boundary changes only) Silver Hill – Extended Call for Sites – v4
23 Dec 2018 – Update to extended call for sites map at Silver Hill Silver Hill – Extended Call for Sites – v3
Responses to extended call for sites map : Silver Hill, Swiftsden and Hurst Green Village
Initial call for sites responses map: Silver Hill and Hurst Green Village and Swiftsden
Individual Site Plans
Where site owners have provided information to the Neighbourhood Plan these documents are shown here. Materials here do not imply approval by the Neighbourhood Plan and/or Parish Council:
Site HG 11 – Cooks Field, Burgh Hill
HG 11 – Outline concept materials January 2020
HG 11 – Letter from Site Agents to Neigbourhood Plan December 2019
HG 11 – Initial outline concept materials December 2019
Site HG 23 – Land near Pentwood Place
The developer of the HG 23 site has submitted their site for planning to Rother District Council outside of the Neighbourhood Plan process. For further details and additional documents please see the Rother District Council planning portal.
HG 23 – Refusal of Outline Planning Permission October 2019
HG 23 – Revised Proposed Block Plan
HG 23 – Location Plan, Existing Block Plan and Proposed Block Plan
Site HG 35 – Foundry Close
The developer of the HG 35 site has submitted their site for planning to Rother District Council outside of the Neighbourhood Plan process. For further details and additional documents please see the Rother District Council planning portal.
HG 35 – Parish Council Response December 2019
HG 35 – Developer Submitted Site Layout October 2019
HG 35 – Developer Submitted Landscape Plan October 2019
HG 35 – Developer Submitted Perspective Sketch October 2019
HG 35 – Developer Submitted 2nd Perspective Sketch October 2019
HG 35 – Developer Submitted Financial Viability Assessment October 2019
HG 35 – proposed scaled sketch layout (not current) August 2019
HG 35 – initial proposed scaled sketch layout (not current)
HG 35 – a 3D Perspective sketch (not current)
Site HG 38 – Windmill Farm
HG38 – Proposed Site Boundary Plan
Landowner Communications
Key communications that have been sent to land owners, and/or their agents can be found on the communications page.
“Housing development within the High Weald is necessary and desirable in creating a thriving and successful place, but it is also a responsibility and privilege to make long-lasting interventions in such
a special and protected landscape. Past development has shown how this special opportunity has often been squandered on generic housing developments failing to capitalise on the true character of the place…”
Building for the High Weald – Design Guidance , High Weald Joint Advisory Committee
Land at Foundry Close Appeal decision:
“…the layout proposed would result in one that does not entirely reflect the prevailing pattern of development within the locality. For example,
the appellant has used large areas of shared surfaces where the village [Hurst Green]
typically has pavements and roads. Another difference is that the part of the village along the High Street has both a variation in built form and a closer knit physical appearance. To the contrary, rather than reflecting the rural character of the village by incorporating landscape features such as the tree-lined eastwest ditch, the appeal scheme appears as a suburban development with surface car park areas and small blocks of flats for example…”
Inspector
“sufficient practical parking provision should be provided in the first instance…”